Skip to content
All comparisons
Comparison

SupabasevsPocketBase

TL;DR

PocketBase is a single Go binary with SQLite, auth, files, realtime, and an admin UI baked in. Supabase is a Postgres-backed platform. Pick PocketBase for small, single-server side projects you want to own. Pick Supabase for anything that will outlive a weekend.

  • Side project, self-host the binary

    PocketBase

  • Production SaaS

    Supabase

  • Postgres + RLS workflow

    Supabase

  • Zero-ops single binary

    PocketBase

FeatureSupabasePocketBase
DatabasePostgresSQLite (embedded)
DeploymentManaged or Docker bundleSingle Go binary
RealtimePostgres replicationBuilt-in WebSocket
AuthGoTrue + JWTBundled
StorageS3-compatibleLocal filesystem or S3
Schema migrationsDrizzle, Prisma, AtlasMigrations CLI (basic)
RLS-style authorizationNative Postgres RLSCollection rules (custom DSL)
Horizontal scalingRead replicas, branchingSingle writer (SQLite limit)
AI-agent friendlinessFull schema introspectionSQLite introspection works

When PocketBase wins

  • You want one binary you can scp to a VPS and forget about. PocketBase is genuinely  zero-ops in a way Supabase isn't.
  • Your project is small enough that SQLite's single-writer limit doesn't matter. Personal tools, internal apps, weekend hacks.
  • You don't want to think about a cloud bill or a sign-up flow.
  • You like the bundled admin UI and don't need anything more.

When Supabase wins

  • Your project has users with relationships and you want Postgres RLS as your authorization layer.
  • You expect concurrent writes. SQLite's single-writer ceiling becomes a real problem under B2B SaaS load.
  • You need the Postgres ecosystem: pgvector for RAG, pg_partman for time-series, replication, extensions, the works.
  • You're vibe-coding. Agent productivity against Postgres is a real notch above SQLite for relational shapes.

Honest take

PocketBase is a beautiful tool for a narrow use case: small, single-instance, self-hosted apps where the developer wants to own everything. We love it for personal tools. For a real product with users, Supabase's richer stack (Postgres + RLS + Realtime + Auth + Storage at scale) earns its complexity. The two aren't really competitors; they're sized for different jobs.

Other comparisons